Breaking News
More () »

Let's Just Vote: Colorado will decide on Prop. 114

This is part of a series of statewide ballot reviews called "We Don't Have To Agree, But Let's Just Vote." Today we look at Prop. 114, about gray wolves.

COLORADO, USA — This story is part of a series of statewide ballot issue reviews for Next: We Don't Have To Agree, But Let's Just Vote.

Proposition 114 is summarized on your ballot, but the extent of the potential new state statute is spelled out in the back of your Blue Book. Even in those two pages, it doesn't include all the information you may want to know before selecting "yes" or "no."

A YES vote means you want the Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) Commission to develop a plan to reintroduce gray wolves into areas west of the Continental Divide by the end of 2023.

CPW would be required to hold statewide hearings to develop that plan.

The new state law would also require CPW to provide fair compensation to owners of livestock for any losses caused by gray wolves.

A NO vote means CPW would not have to reintroduce gray wolves.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service still considered the gray wolf (Canis lupus) as endangered, so any reintroduction would require federal approval. If the gray wolf is removed from the endangered list, then Colorado can move forward on its own.

Earlier this year, after enough signatures were submitted to qualify the issue for the ballot, video from Moffat County appeared to show two gray wolves in northwest Colorado.

RELATED: CPW says evidence indicates likely presence of a wolf pack in northwest Colorado

Rocky Mountain Wolf Action Fund, the group that put Proposition 114 on the ballot, argues that bringing back gray wolves can help reduce the elk and deer population, which in turn could restore grass and vegetation, which could have other potentially positive effects on the environment.

One argument against revolves around money.

In 2016, the CPW Commission voted against reintroducing gray wolves and, in a memo explained why. Part of the reason included money.

"Without additional funding, or reductions in existing programs to compensate for the increased expense, efforts to actively release wolves into the state are not possible. No wolf advocacy group has stepped forward and offered to fund a wolf management program," the commission wrote.

RELATED: CPW opposes plan to bring gray wolves to CO

Why would they need money?

Part of Proposition 114 calls for fair compensation to livestock owners if their livestock are harmed by gray wolves. What is fair compensation? And what is considered livestock?

Fair compensation is not explained in the Blue Book summary nor the text of the law that would be created that's printed in the back of Blue Book.

The definition of livestock is included in the text of the law.

Livestock includes: cattle, horses, mules, burros, sheep, lambs, swine, llama, alpaca and goats.

Regarding fair compensation, the law in the back of the Blue Book references current state statute 33-3-107.

That statute explains the claim procedure a livestock owner must take.

"When any person has sustained damages to property caused by any wildlife, he shall notify the division of such damages within ten days after the discovery thereof," the statute reads.

Long story, short, the livestock owner submits a claim, then CPW either reaches an agreement and settles, or the claim ends up in front of the commission.

The amount of money would be case-by-case.

Montana has a "livestock loss board" and currently pays out for livestock losses.

So far in 2020, Montana's Department of Livestock has paid out $129,235 for 167 livestock.

In 2019, the payouts totaled $260,838 for 373 livestock. And in 2018, the state paid $230,411 for 294 livestock losses.

Rocky Mountain Wolf Action Fund has received $1.9 million in favor of Proposition 114.

  • $400,000: The Tides Center, a San Francisco-based nonprofit for progressive causes including environmental issues.
  • $254,275: Richard Pritzlaff, a conservation biologist in Boulder who is president of Biophilia Foundation with a headquarters in Maryland and a ranch in New Mexico.
  • $60,000: The Center for Biological Diversity in Tucson
Credit: Getty Images/iStockphoto

RELATED: Gray wolf reintroduction initiative qualifies for November ballot

There are two groups opposing Proposition 114.

Stop the Wolf PAC (political action committee) has received $87,000. About 200 have come from small donors.

  • $17,000: Center for Organization Research and Education, a Washington D.C. nonprofit "Uncovering the truth about Big Green's agenda"
  • $15,000: Elk Creek Ranch Owners Association in Meeker

Coloradans Protecting Wildlife is the other committee opposing Proposition 114.

It has received more than $750,000 in contributions.

  • $312,000: Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation in Missoula, MT

SUGGESTED VIDEOS: Breaking down Colorado's 2020 ballot 

Before You Leave, Check This Out